Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:09

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Is it normal to hate my dog, but feel too guilty to get rid of him?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Attenborough's Ocean a Brutal, Beautiful Wake-up Call - Newser
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Save up to $357 off Apple’s most affordable 13-inch Space Black M4 iPad Pro today - 9to5Toys
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Amazon launches new R&D group focused on agentic AI and robotics - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.